Skip to main content
Considerate CapitalPlan thoughtfully
A quiet tool

Stay or sell: the money side, on sliders.

A paid-off house still costs money every year, and the equity earns nothing you can spend; selling costs the transaction and then rent. Enter the house, the costs, and what the money could earn, and see where the two paths stand after the years you pick.

An assumption tool · Method reviewed September 7, 2026 · Facts · The table · Methodology

$

Your best estimate of what it would sell for now.

$

This is the basis, the starting point for figuring any tax on the gain when you sell.

$
Filing status

It sets the home-sale exclusion, the part of the gain that is tax free. The tool assumes selling costs of 6 percent and a 15 percent tax rate on any gain above it.

After 10 years, keeping leaves more by
$61,513
If you keep the house, your equity would stand at $810,997 after subtracting the yearly costs of owning it and the return that money could have earned instead. If you sell, you would net $752,000 after selling costs and no tax on the gain, invest it at 5%, pay $36,000 a year in rent, and end with $749,484.
What you would have each year, keeping versus selling, over 10 yearsTwo lines. Keeping the house ends at $810,997. Selling and renting ends at $749,484.$0$250k$500k$750k$1MYr 0Yr 3Yr 5Yr 8Yr 10Keep the houseSell and rent
Net cost of owning in the first year
$36,000
Property tax, insurance, and upkeep, plus the return the equity could have earned, minus the rise in value
Net cost of renting in the first year
$-1,600
Rent minus what the sale money earns
Cash in hand if you sold today
$752,000
After 6% selling costs and no tax on the gain

Three assumptions decide the answer. They are how fast the house gains value, what the sale money earns, and what rent costs. Move any of them and the lines cross somewhere else, which is why they are sliders. The tax on the sale is often nothing, because the home-sale exclusion covers the gain. The money question is usually the yearly costs and the equity, not the tax.

This is an assumption tool, not a rule, and every input is yours to set. It assumes selling costs of 6 percent, a 15 percent tax rate on any gain above the home-sale exclusion, no income tax on the investment returns, no moving costs, no change in rent or yearly costs beyond the rates you entered, and no mortgage paydown. Method reviewed September 7, 2026. Hypothetical; educational, not advice.

This is a simplified model, not your actual tax return or plan. It only knows what you type in, leaves out rules that may apply to you, and cannot weigh the other facts and trade-offs a real decision depends on. Before you act, talk with a professional who knows your whole situation.

Built by Joshua Mangoubi, CFA, MBA. By using this tool you agree to the tool terms, which include that results vary with each use and over time. Cite this tool, or take a table or chart

How it counts. Two paths run forward year by year: the house's equity net of carrying costs at what they could have earned, against the proceeds after costs and any tax on the gain, invested and paying rent; the position of each at the end.

What it assumes. Every input is yours, and three of them decide the answer: appreciation, return, and rent. The tool prices the money side so the other side, where you want to live, can be weighed against a figure rather than a fear.

Where we fit in. We integrate tax considerations into your investment strategy and collaborate with estate attorneys and CPAs to ensure your plan is coordinated. We are not a law firm or accounting firm, so we do not provide legal or tax advice. Everything in this material is for educational purposes, based on primary sources. Before taking any action, please consult the appropriate professionals to apply these ideas to your situation.

The facts, in one place.

Six quotable sentences on staying or selling.

  1. Staying in a paid-off house is not free: property tax, insurance, and upkeep run two to three percent of its value a year for many homes, and the equity earns nothing you can spend. Selling is not free either: the transaction costs several percent, any gain above the exclusion is taxed, and rent replaces the carrying costs.
  2. The fair comparison is over time: what you would have after some years if you kept the house (its equity, less the carrying costs you paid, at what that money could have earned) against what you would have if you sold (the proceeds invested, less the rent you paid).
  3. Example: a paid-off $800,000 house costing $20,000 a year to carry and appreciating 3 percent, against selling for $752,000 after costs, investing at 5 percent, and paying $36,000 a year in rent. After ten years, keeping leaves about $810,997 and selling about $749,484.
  4. The answer turns on three assumptions more than any other: the appreciation rate on the house, the return on the freed equity, and the rent. Small changes in each swing the result, which is why the tool shows all three.
  5. The tax on the sale is often zero: a couple excludes the first five hundred thousand of gain, a single person half that, and the tool applies the exclusion before the gains rate.
  6. The number that is not in the arithmetic is the one people decide on: the house is where they live. The tool prices the money side so the other side can be weighed against a figure rather than a fear.

Ten years on.

How the answer moves with one assumption.

The example house kept or sold, after ten years, at four appreciation rates, with a 5 percent return on the proceeds and $36,000 of yearly rent (hypothetical assumptions; method reviewed September 7, 2026)
House appreciationKept: position after 10 yearsSold: position after 10 yearsKeeping ahead by
2%$711,060$749,484$-38,425
3%$810,997$749,484$61,513
4%$920,060$749,484$170,575
5%$1,038,980$749,484$289,496

How the comparison works.

Keeping a house costs its carrying charges every year and forgoes what the equity could earn, offset by whatever the house appreciates. Selling costs the transaction and any tax on the gain above the exclusion, then rent every year, offset by the return on the proceeds. Neither side is free, and the fair comparison is the position after a chosen run of years: the house's equity net of the carrying costs paid along the way, at what that money could have earned, against the invested proceeds net of the rent paid.

The result turns on three assumptions more than anything else, the appreciation, the return, and the rent, and small changes in each move the lines. That is why the tool is sliders rather than a verdict. The tax on the sale is often nothing, because the exclusion covers most gains, so the money question is the carrying costs and the equity, not the tax; and the question that is not in the arithmetic is the one people decide on.

Methodology.

  1. Inputs. The house's value, mortgage, and cost basis; yearly carrying costs; appreciation; rent; the return on freed money; filing status for the exclusion; and the years to compare. Selling costs of 6 percent and a 15 percent gains rate are fixed.
  2. Selling. Equity less selling costs less the gains rate on the gain above the § 121 exclusion; then each year the pot earns the return and pays the rent.
  3. Keeping. The house appreciates and the equity is value less the fixed mortgage; the carrying costs paid each year are carried as a negative balance at the return, since that money could have been invested.
  4. The comparison. The two positions after the years; the year-one costs of each path; and the paths drawn as lines.
  5. Validation. The net proceeds and zero gain tax under the joint exclusion in the example; a ten-year path; and a flat case where the two positions differ by exactly the selling costs. A transcription error fails the build.
  6. Not modeled. Income tax on the investment returns, mortgage paydown and interest, moving costs, changes in rent or carrying costs beyond the rates, and the non-financial reasons that usually decide it. Hypothetical throughout. Educational, not advice.

Revision history.

The assumption tools' history.

September 7, 2026
Added should you buy points (the bought-down loan against the plain one on the same principal and term, so the position is the interest saved less the cost of the points; true break-even as the first month at or above zero beside the simple rule; the horizon verdict; the return the points earn to the horizon as the monthly-compounded rate at which their cost equals the present value of the saving plus the lower balance owed, by bisection; the largest points count that pays off within the horizon; and the seller-paid case set against the same dollars off the price).
September 7, 2026
Added two mortgage assumption tools: refinance break-even (the simple rule, closing costs over the monthly saving, beside the month-by-month count of interest paid on each loan, where total cost is the balance plus the closing costs plus the interest so far, so the new loan's position is the interest saved less the costs; the reset-the-clock effect flagged when a longer term catches up), and 15-year or 30-year mortgage (the same cash on both paths, the 15-year payment invested after the loan is gone against the difference invested for thirty years, compared at year 15, year 30, and a chosen horizon, with the break-even return by bisection).
September 7, 2026
Added three assumption tools: Roth or traditional 401(k) (the same take-home cost grown at one return and taxed at each end, so the answer turns on the two rates; the plan limit from the annual record), pay off the mortgage or invest (two month-by-month paths, the extra to the mortgage and then the freed payment invested, against the extra invested throughout, with the optional interest deduction), and how much life insurance (the present value of the income to replace as a growing annuity, plus debts, final expenses, and education, less existing coverage and savings, beside the ten-times-income rule).
September 6, 2026
Added two assumption tools: sell or keep the house (carrying costs and appreciation against rent and the return on freed equity, with the home-sale exclusion), and the long-term care cost projection (today's rate at care inflation to the start year, summed over the years of care, with the set-aside today).
September 4, 2026
First release of the longevity projection (year-by-year, spending and outside income indexed to inflation, a fixed return on the remainder, with the sustainable-spending solver) and the pension-versus-lump-sum comparison (the lump sum invested and paying the pension, with the break-even return solver).

Canonical address: https://consideratecapital.com/tools/sell-or-keep-the-house

A first conversation

When you are ready, this is worth an unhurried conversation.

A first call with an advisor, just to get to know each other. No preparation needed, and no obligation on either side.

A Considerate Retirement cover art
Podcast

A Considerate Retirement

Thoughtful, practical guidance for the years after work — on money, and on the life it is for.